My previous post about the sexuality and gender oriented graffiti that appeared in Fitzroy around Young and St David streets recently drew immediate criticism from a local (perhaps a resident of the Max apartment building on that corner, which was damaged by it). The graffiti was entirely amateurish in technique and blatantly naive in motive. Despite its pointlessness, however, I’d like to share another example to make a point of my own.

The neatly painted white house, on the corner of St David St and George St, has had its side wall tagged with the phrase ‘google trans issues’, presumably by someone whose agenda is to promote awareness of and respect for transsexual people.

google-trans-issues google criminal damage

That is a reasonable objective, but this is not the way to do it. Needlessly causing a problem for someone else is mean, selfish and stupid, and demonstrates a fundamental lack of respect. Asking for respect while demonstrating disrespect is indicative of a feeble and pathetic mind. They’re hardly likely to be googling criminal damage.

Furthermore, while respectful and accepting behaviour should be considered the norm, it is unreasonable to expect understanding from others. Most people are ignorant about most things. While ignorance often motivates discrimination, ignorance itself is not a crime and understanding cannot be taken for granted or required of others.

Whatever your issue is, demanding that strangers research your issue for your benefit can be read as indicative of a ridiculous sense of entitlement. Get over yourself. Write something about it on Facebook, not someone’s wall.

google criminal damage

3 thoughts on “google criminal damage

  • 26 September 2015 at 11:27 am
    Permalink

    Brian,

    Excellent.

    I would like your thoughts on criminal tagging to be codified into a treatise that would form the foundational content of an education course enforced on prosecuted street-scribblers.
    They should read aloud from this treatise and then provide a critique of their own works, outlining the effectiveness of their message as well as the negative consequences they caused.
    And because their messages are public ones, the course should be held in public.

    Reply
    • 26 September 2015 at 5:13 pm
      Permalink

      If I wasn’t a person who abhors violence I’d settle for giving them a good kick up their trans-arse and making them pay to have the wall repainted.

      Reply
  • 25 October 2015 at 4:55 pm
    Permalink

    Gosh that’s a VERY plain boring white wall. Nice to see some free and attention-grabbing political art appear on it, getting us talking about an issue which needs attention. Thanks so much for this post :-)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *